AEGIS Governed Capability Flow

Architectural Enforcement & Governance of Intelligent Systems

Version: 0.2
Status: Informational
Part of: AEGIS Architecture
Author: Kenneth Tannenbaum
Last Updated: March 6, 2026


Purpose

This document defines the end-to-end capability flow and the control contract for each stage from request proposal to execution outcome.

End-to-End Flow

1) User/System Intent
2) Agent Action Proposal
3) Capability Request Construction
4) Governance Admission Validation
5) Policy Matching and Precedence
6) Risk Calculation
7) Decision Outcome
8) Constraint Packaging (if required)
9) Audit Record Creation
10) Tool Proxy Execution or Block
11) Execution Telemetry and Post-Decision Audit

Stage Contracts

Stage 1-3: Proposal and Request Creation

Required outputs:

Stage 4: Admission Validation

Required checks:

Failure behavior:

Stage 5: Policy Matching

Required behavior:

Stage 6: Risk Calculation

Required behavior:

Stage 7-8: Decision and Constraints

Possible outcomes:

Constraint-bearing outcomes must include enforceable machine-readable limits.

Stage 9-11: Audit and Execution

Required behavior:

Flow Invariants

  1. No request executes without a prior decision.2
  2. No decision exists without an audit ID.2
  3. No constrained request executes unconstrained.
  4. No denied request causes infrastructure side effects.

Decision Matrix

Decision Execution Constraints Escalation Audit
ALLOW Yes Optional No Required
CONSTRAIN Yes Required No Required
ESCALATE No N/A Required Required
DENY No N/A Optional Required

Verification Checks

The flow is valid only if:


References

Footnotes

  1. F. B. Schneider, “Enforceable Security Policies,” ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–50, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1145/353323.353382. See REFERENCES.md.

  2. J. P. Anderson, “Computer Security Technology Planning Study,” Deputy for Command and Management Systems, HQ Electronic Systems Division (AFSC), Hanscom Field, Bedford, MA, Tech. Rep. ESD-TR-73-51, Vol. II, Oct. 1972. See REFERENCES.md. 2